Documentation that agrees with itself.
SAG Portal reads an event’s full safety pack, shows the organiser exactly where the documents contradict each other, and then publishes the pack as one secure portal for the Safety Advisory Group.
Why this exists
An event safety pack is written by many hands. The medical plan comes from the medical provider, the traffic plan from the traffic contractor, the crowd plan from the security company, and each is revised on its own clock. The result is familiar to anyone who has sat in a Safety Advisory Group meeting: two capacities for the same site, three versions of the same dates, last year’s schedule still sitting in this year’s appendix.
Those contradictions usually surface in the meeting itself, in front of the exact people an organiser most wants to reassure. We built SAG Portal because we were the ones sitting in those meetings.
Who is behind it
SAG Portal was founded by Ben Atkins, an event director who has spent two decades producing and safety-managing festivals, fan zones and city events across the UK, and who has prepared and presented safety documentation to Safety Advisory Groups throughout.
How the reading works
The reading itself is done by AI built for this one job, working through every figure, date, name and cross-reference in every document. The method comes from people: a register of the things a pack must cover and the places documents must agree, drawn from years of real packs and real SAG scrutiny.
One principle governs every finding: the check reports, it never adjudicates. If two documents disagree on capacity, we show you both figures with their sources ≠ side by side, and the judgement about which is right stays where it belongs, with the organiser. The check also never sees the real world, so it will never tell you an event is safe. It tells you whether your paperwork agrees with itself, which is a different and honest claim.
What we believe
A pack that agrees with itself is the mark of an event that has been thought through, and it changes the tone of the room. Nothing we make replaces the organiser’s judgement or the Safety Advisory Group’s scrutiny. It makes both faster, and it lets the meeting be about the event rather than the typos.